0

+1 Yu gi oh! I whole heatedly endorse your point of view. EVERY entry is titled "<actress> Nude" or "<movie> Nude Scenes." Far too much content is added that just doesn't fit. "...exquisite sexual character" is too subjective and the moderators seem unwilling to police this. As you rightly cited: h__p://celebrities.jocundist.com/help.html ... "Most importantly, all media files must contain a full or partial nudity or at least have exquisite sexual character. All other media will be removed by the moderators."

0

Last time I saw, the arrows were in the appearance itself, but I haven't seen them for a long time now. If you can't see any arrows, or anything similar, my guess would be they removed them, or it's our browser settings. And if that's in the rules, which I haven't read because I only update missing info really, then I stand corrected.

0

Im going by the first posting rule, dont get your panties in a bunch. Most importantly, all media files must contain a full or partial nudity or at least have exquisite sexual character. All other media will be removed by the moderators. These easy to google pics dont contain any "exquisite" quality. That loophole has filled the site with trash getty images and boring screen grabs ( some not even clearly showing the actress). So I want to know how to down vote. If someone else likes it, let them upvote. That what voting is for. I still would like to know how voting is accomplished on the site.

0

No. This is a site that contains nudity. A mistake so many of you keep making. It clarifies that at the bottom. It's further clarified with the keyword tag, "No Nudity". Also, "a waste of time", that's your opinion, not fact about them. Many, many people like to look at whatever pictures of their favourite celebs. If there was something bad about the appearance, sure, downvote. It's just a non-nude appearance, then you're being an asshole.

1

Because this is a site for nude appearances. Downvoting lets people know that the scenes are non nude and a waste of time.